The
ambiguity underlying scientific progress is perhaps no where more creatively expressed
than in utopian literature and science-fiction. In both genres, science is
depicted variously as: the indispensable element of a perfect society; a field
prone to misuse and destructiveness, its product a nightmarish reality; and the
conceptual framework of a world—often projected into the future—remarkable not
for its moral quality but its metaphysical curiosity. The boundaries between
these interpretations are blurred in the dystopian narrative, a hybrid of both
genres, of which Yevgeny Zamyatin’s We—a
tale set in the twenty-sixth century A.D., in the regimented totalitarian
society of OneState—is the modern exemplar.
Written in 1921
and published in 1924, We stakes its
claim to the modernist tradition of the early twentieth century by virtue of
its experimental boldness in form and content, its open-endedness, and
self-reflexivity. These aesthetic strategies also reinforce the novel’s negative
image of scientific progress, and by extension, underscore Modernism’s reaction
to scientific rationality. Thus, We effectively
deconstructs the metanarrative of late nineteenth-century Positivism—a total
worldview of human society and the natural environment—by casting it in a
dystopian world, in which freedom and individuality have been abolished. Nevertheless,
though the novel dramatizes Modernist
anxiety over scientific rationalism, it does not repudiate science itself;
rather, it cautions against the excesses of science and its potentially
dangerous relationship with the state.
No comments :
Post a Comment